Imagine no birthday

I fail to see what, in the blooming garden of the devil, the above headline from Alana Goodman and published by Fox News, The Washington Free Beacon, and a host of other news media, has to do with anything at all.

This article mimics similar reports that have ricocheted through the media since February 9th. Someone has mined a treasure chest of previously private memos and correspondence shared between Hillary and her best friend, and dating back to before her husband’s entry into the White House some thirty years ago.

Random quotes have been published that, according to Ms. Goodman, “shed new light on Clinton’s three decades in public life. The records paint a complex portrait of Hillary Clinton, revealing her to be a loyal friend, devoted mother, and a cutthroat strategist who relished revenge against her adversaries and complained in private that nobody in the White House was ‘tough and mean enough.’”

Hillary is a complex person. This is news?
Hillary is a loyal friend and devoted mother. This is shocking news?
Hillary is a cutthroat strategist. Isn’t that what we expect of politicians? Don’t we expect them to lead us, strategically through all sorts of complex, unexpected, and never yet encountered crises?
Hillary relishes revenge? She certainly isn’t alone in this failing, as we see over and over in the political theater.
Hillary is tough and mean? Is there any other way to survive the mud baths, personal attacks, vicious rumors, and sensationalized reporting that now goes hand in hand with any political campaign? If Hillary had balls, she’d be a leader. But instead she has breasts, so she’s a bitch. Pardon me.

p>What Hillary may have confided to her closest confidante while she endured intense personal and marital pain under the spotlight of 24/7 national media attention has absolutely nothing to do with her qualifications or her ability to get the job done, whatever job she embarks upon. Whatever sophomoric pranks her husband has pulled in his life, have absolutely no bearing on his wife’s ability to do her job.

Does this rash of yellow headlines indicate that our nation must endure, yet again, the utter humiliation and stupification of the Monica Lewinski affair? Who the fuck cares where the former President’s peter has been?

We should be caring about how our current and future leaders will anticipate market upheavals, world political entanglements, national health pandemics, and a contrary Congress that has become so constipated it no longer functions.

The world doesn’t care about Monica. Nor should we. I don’t even know if I would support Hillary for President. What I do know is that what’s masquerading as headline news is nothing but yellow journalism.

We the people, have been had! Part II

29 Wednesday Jan 2014

Posted by rangewriter in Everything else

≈ 18 Comments

Tags

compromise, debate, Democracy, Dr. David Adler, Five Modest Suggestions, Idaho, Luna laws, politics, public opinion, public policy, reasoned discourse

How can we collaborate in a sea of sharks? Before we can begin to influence public policy, we need to shape public opinion. Individually we are little more than pesky voices shouting into the wind. But when we join forces our power multiplies exponentially and that is how public opinion grows legs.

Before we can hold our leaders accountable, we must be accountable to ourselves and to each other. We must rediscover the lost art of negotiation. Compromise is not a dirty word. Compromise is the only way that a democracy can work. There is absolutely no possibility of meeting each individual’s agenda in a country comprised of over 316,000,000 people with myriad colors, religions, beliefs, and cultural backgrounds.

Below I paraphrase Dr. David Adler, author and national lecturer specializing in public law, the Supreme Court, the Presidency and American political thought, in what he calls Five Modest Suggestions to Improve Public Discourse.

Stop Political Labeling: It is all too easy to hang a label on a person or an idea but labels are the lazy way of dealing with complex issues. By dismissing a person for a perceived (or real) ideology we come to the negotiation table with closed minds and closed ears. This prevents the second item.
Listen: Listen carefully to what the opposition has to say because you may find some point of commonality from which you can build mutual understanding and perhaps craft a completely new stance that could satisfy both sides of the coin. Today’s opponents may be tomorrow’s ally.
Be Fair to Each Other: Again, today’s opponents may be tomorrow’s ally. If we alienate each other, compromise becomes impossible. Listening breaks down. Constructive dialogue requires truth and honesty. Don’t lie about or to an opponent. Don’t mix up or convolute the facts of an opposing position. Successful negotiation comes about through persuasion, not through duplicity or bullying. Don’t allow:
- Distortions
- Demagoguery (emotional pleas based on prejudice and fear)
- Snake Oil
Avoid the Politics of Destruction: Again, today’s opponents may be tomorrow’s ally! If we demonize an opponent it is that much harder to find common ground or to join forces when we do find common ground.
- Politics is not war
- Words are not bullets.
Avoid Rigidity: Good public policy is fluid, able to shift with changing demographics, needs, and applications. Compromise is the only way we can make democracy work in a country with 316,000,000 different points of view. Compromise is impossible in the face of rigid thinking.

Reasoned Discourse requires understanding and accepting the scientific method. Just as we must listen to other points of view, we must also support our arguments with factual evidence, not with hyperbole, rumor, or wishful thinking.

Shaping Public Policy requires us to demonstrate to others how our ideas will benefit them. Once we have learned to talk openly and honesty with each other in small groups, and have learned to listen for that which unites rather than that which divides, then we can implement a unified voice to shape public policy through fact based letters to the editor and emails and phone calls to our representatives. Legislators are powerless against rising popular opinion. Numbers talk!

In Idaho, the top-down implementation of the Luna laws (among other things) offended Democrats. The purchase of expensive technology required by the Luna laws (among other things) offended Republicans. Each side had a vested interest in undoing that legislation and by working with each other rather than against each other, education policy that the Governor and the Superintendent of Public Instruction had lobbied hard to put in place was successfully unraveled.

As an example of what I consider reasoned discourse, I offer the following link to an opinion offered by an Idaho official regarding a highly controversial topic in our state. The article appeared in the Idaho Statesman on January 29, 2014.Lawrence Schoen: Idaho needs a new wolf management structure

Where do you look for information upon which to base your decisions and beliefs?